One of the big projects for me this quarter was getting our Talos slaves configured as a pool of machines shared across branches. The details are being tracked in bug 488367 for those interested in the details.
This is a continuation of our work on pooling our slaves, like we've done over the past year with our build, unittest, and l10n slaves.
Up until now each branch has had a dedicated set of Mac Minis to run performance tests for just that branch, on five different operating systems. For example, the Firefox 3.0 branch used to have 19 Mac Minis doing regular Talos tests: 4 of each platform (except for Leopard, which had 3). Across our 4 active branches (Firefox 3.0, 3.5, 3.next, and TraceMonkey), we have around 80 minis in total! That's a lot of minis!
What we've been working towards is to put all the Talos slaves into one pool that is shared between all our active branches. Slaves will be given builds to test in FIFO order, regardless of which branch the build is produced on.
This new pool will be....
With more slaves available to all branches, the time to wait for a free slave will go down, so testing can start more quickly...which means you get your results sooner!
It will be able to handle varying load between branches. If there's a lot of activity on one branch, like on the Firefox 3.5 branch before a release, then more slaves will be available to test those builds and won't be sitting idle waiting for builds from low activity branches.
We will be able to scale our infrastructure much better using a pooled system. Similar to how moving to pooled build and unittest slaves has allowed us to scale based on number of checkins rather than number of branches, having pooled Talos slaves will allow us to scale our capacity based on number of builds produced rather than the number of branches.
In the current setup, each new release or project branch required an allocation of at least 15 minis to dedicate to the branch.
Once all our Talos slaves are pooled, we will be able to add Talos support for new project or release branches with a few configuration changes instead of waiting for new minis to be provisioned.
This means we can get up and running with new project branches much more quickly!
We'll also be in a much better position in terms of maintenance of the machines. When a slave goes offline, the test coverage for any one branch won't be jeopardized since we'll still have the rest of the slaves that can test builds from that branch.
In the current setup, if one or two machines of the same platform needs maintenance on one branch, then our performance test coverage of that branch is significantly impacted. With only one or two machines remaining to run tests on that platform, it can be difficult to determine if a performance regression is caused by a code change, or is caused by some machine issue. Losing two or three machines in this scenario is enough to close the tree, since we no longer have reliable performance data.
With pooled slaves we would see a much more gradual decrease in coverage when machines go offline. It's the difference between losing one third of the machines on your branch, and losing one tenth.
When is all this going to happen?
Some of it has started already! We have a small
pool of slaves testing builds from our four branches right now. If you know how to coerce Tinderbox to show you hidden columns, you can take a look for yourself. They're also reporting to the new graph server
using machines names starting with 'talos-rev2'.
We have some new minis waiting to be added to the pool. Together with existing slaves, this will give us around 25 machines in total to start off the new pool. This isn't enough yet to be able to test every build from each branch without skipping any, so for the moment the pool will be skipping to the most recent build per branch if there's any backlog.
It's worth pointing out that our current Talos system also skips builds if there's any backlog. However, our goal is to turn off skipping once we have enough slaves in the pool to handle our peak loads comfortably.
After this initial batch is up and running, we'll be waiting for a suitable time to start moving the existing Talos slaves into the pool.
All in all, this should be a big win for everyone!