<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python Warts, part 2 &#8211; the infamous GIL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atlee.ca/blog/2006/06/27/python-warts-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atlee.ca/blog/2006/06/27/python-warts-2/</link>
	<description>programming, photography, media, and anything else that strikes my fancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:08:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bicking</title>
		<link>http://atlee.ca/blog/2006/06/27/python-warts-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4534</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bicking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atlee.ca/blog/2006/06/27/python-warts-2/#comment-4534</guid>
		<description>Note I never said that the current situation was perfect, or even very good.  IPC is way harder in Python than it should be.  So...

&quot;&quot;&quot;In the short term, some slick IPC would be nice, but in the long term a truly multithreaded Python interpreter would benefit everybody.&quot;&quot;&quot;

I&#039;d switch those: in the short term a truly multithreaded Python interpreter would be nice, but slick IPC in Python would benefit everybody.  And it doesn&#039;t even require much (any?) interpreter work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note I never said that the current situation was perfect, or even very good.  IPC is way harder in Python than it should be.  So&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;"In the short term, some slick IPC would be nice, but in the long term a truly multithreaded Python interpreter would benefit everybody.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d switch those: in the short term a truly multithreaded Python interpreter would be nice, but slick IPC in Python would benefit everybody.  And it doesn&#8217;t even require much (any?) interpreter work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

